Search results

Spacial Rupture Quick-Play spell card. Activate only when a player activated Dark Hole. Remove from play all monsters on the field and in both players hand. No monster can be summoned to the field for the remainder of this turn and the next turn. Next Card: Special Rapture (I changed 2...

Jason,your post wasn't logical: You made a False Dilemma: You assumed that the only thing either player could do was Pass or Activate a card. One can say that you could: Pass Priority, Activate a card, OR Announce that you plan on leaving the window. You also made the assumption that the...

Nothing Impossible about it. Several cards do pay "costs" at resolution (Order to Charge, Order to Smash, Share the Pain, Ritual Spells) "Pay" would indicate that the Life Point change will be relevant to the card "Life Absorbing Machine."

It says all 6 monsters on the bottom of any one tin. Also, the way it was worded suggests that the next 3 tins might have a different mix of boosters. (These had 2 CRV 1EEN 1 SOI 1 EOJ I believe)

I'll give you my "Busted Bladder" for your "¦

Supreme Dark Magician Dark/Spellcaster/7stars ATK2500/DEF2100 This monster cannot be Special Summoned except by tributing one "Dark Magician" one "Mystic Tomato" and one "Sour Cream of the Crop." When this card inflicts battle damage to your opponents Lifepoints, the damage becomes the sum of...

Avalanching Sky Hawk Wind Winged Beast/ 2 stars/ 400/0 This cards ATK can not be modified except by this card's effect. Double this card's ATK each time this card inflicts damage to your opponent's Lifepoints. Next Card: Perfectly Ultimate Insect LV12

You may have 3 Cyber Dragons and 3 Proto-Cyber Dragons in your deck, (and a total of 6 on the field (e.g if one were being treated as an equip card) Once the duel starts there is no limit on the number of cards of the same name you can have once the duel starts. So in another example you can...

[difficult question] Skill Drain is active Summon Proto-Cyber Dragon Activate Inferno Reckless Summon. Chain Mystical Space Typhoon targetting Skill Drain. Resolve: Mystical Space Typhoon destroys Skill Drain Inferno Reckless Summon Resolves: Summons Proto-Cyber Dragon? Cyber Dragon...

Nearly two years ago: http://www.cogonline.net/showpost.php?p=85070&postcount=117 I said the exact same thing about continuous spells and traps; nothing to do with you.

Other Cards are irrelevant: I can't activated Dark Hole (empty field) with the intention of chaining Call of the Haunted (target: Sangan) Surely dark hole would serve the same "purpose" as Toon World in that sitution: Creating a situation for other cards to get their effects. Hint: The Last...

You cannot activate selecting it because you need to select a machine monster that can be fusion summoned. Its along the lines of an Equip Card that increases the ATK of a warrior monster, it is implied you may only select the monster mentioned on the card. Selecting an appropriate monster is...

If it will do nothing at resolution. Continuos Spells and Traps generally get around the "must do something rule" Afterall, one of them doesn't even have an effect (Toon World) ETA: I agree that you wouldn't be activate Future Fusion selecting XYZ monsters, just not for the above reasons.

Children ARE more intelligent than adults. The human brain removes many connections in its 16th year (after birth), becoming more set in its biases. Again in its 30s the Human Brain becomes set in its ways and unable learn many types of skills and talents. Teaching has nothing to do with...

= Marked With Their Approval = Established by Konami/Mr Takahashi.

Even if I were wrong it is Copyright of mr Takahashi, and no matter who does the translation when that stamp is put on the paper it is assumed to come from him. But then there's these statements: [/color]

If a 2 year-old makes a logical argument as well i will listen. It is not contracted out. It is the Game's Creator's/Konami's decision on translations. (UDE offers input)

I find that statement to be quite bigoted If a 12 year old makes a vaild argument then everyone should listen. If a 60 year Supreme Court Judge makes an opinion, nobody should care. The official ANSWER for the time being from Konami is EXACTLY what is written in the text and the rulings...

Well if the Game Creator matters, then why are you defending a point taht did not come from the Game's Creator. While Jason and i ARE defending the text that came from the Game's Creator. No, we can argue that we are 100% correct because there is a right and wrong answer for the time being...