Search results

My Understanding of Soul Exchange, which UDE has recently confirmed via email, is that this line Basically says "If you play a card or use a game mechanic that requires a monster from your side of the field, that you may or may not currently have on your side of the field, use your opponent's...

Javier confirmed the old ruling still stands last night for me, I've asked if it could be added to the gameplay FAQ and netrep as it seems to be a regular problem.

Thank you all for your help, I've emailed Upperdeck and I'm awaiting their reply.

I wonder if I called someone at UDE or emailed one of the game developers, if they could confirm the ruling stands.

He does follow the judge's list, it's that he considers the proof I gave him to be too outdated and the errata to the card text to justify is point of view. The post is over a year old and the errata is only a few months old, because prior to the errata, he did support the correct play of the card.

Last week I had printed out the posting on the judge's board and he refused to accept that citing that the text errata on the card supported his claim. A few of the players that once supported his side are now on the fence after I talked to them. I doubt I can convince him to post a...

Thank you for clearing it up, now I have to figure out a way to convince the judge.

Hi, I searched the board here, the judge's forum, and elsewhere low and high on the net. Over the last two weeks, I've been debating with the tournament judge about Soul Exchange and if it requires a monster or not on your side of the field to activate. While there is a post on the judge's...