Alright, I'm attempting something big.
- Thread starter Jason_C
- Start date
- Status
krazykidpsx
New Member
the visual kinda resembled too much of a VS card so i moved a few things around, sorry its not the same.
the illustration is by somebody named P. Lipka so credit goes to that person.
the illustration is by somebody named P. Lipka so credit goes to that person.
Seriously, exellent job to the guy who did this, although I'd still prefer more of a medicine capsule shape. (I once played a game called "capsules" and now I'm stuck on it)krazykidpsx
New Member
yea, im not too good at making medicine on photoshop. never really liked to. lol
Ok, I'm thinking of making the gameboard more relevant to the game itself. I want to give it a physical nature, as though these Creatures are actually battling. It occurs to me to give each player a second row of Creature slots. The original back row would be only for Defenders, and the new front row would be only for Aggressors. I'm not entirely sure how to work this in, but I might try some relative position effects. If that made no sense, think about "As long as this Creature is an Aggressor, the opponent cannot attack the Creature directly to the left of this Creature". Any advice on making that type of stuff into actual mechanics will be appreciated.
-pssvr
-pssvr
This is similar to the Leader abiltiy that was introduced in the Avengers set. Charcters adjacent to a Leader character get the modifier that the Leader character would give them. Of course in that game the character has to be directly to one side of the character to be considered adjacent to it. I always thought a fun idea would be to have an pwoer that affected the whole row.
The A: D: H: I have is in a vertical capsule. Do you mean hoizontal?
Text verticle. Will the characters be verticle as well, or will they remain horizontal...
l
i
k
e
t
h
i
s
?
T
h
i
s
i
s
h
a
r
d
t
o
r
e
a
d
:
)
l
i
k
e
t
h
i
s
?
T
h
i
s
i
s
h
a
r
d
t
o
r
e
a
d
:
)
The Advocate
The Prosecutor
I don't know how serious you are about this, but as The Advocate, I would be willing to assist you in any copyright or trademark issues you may encounter (and you will definitely encounter them if you take a step towards publication).
roadhouse007
New Member
Sorry, this guy hasn't been a member for at least a few months now. You might have noticed the thread is over a year old.
I got yelled at once for reviving threads that were too old. It can prove confusing for people to read the old writings if ideas or facts have changed (such as old rulings or a discussion on the April 05 banned list). But there would have been no way to start a new thread about this.
I'm not trying to be rude or mean or anything, but it probably isn't best to revive threads that are this old. The information should be considered 'expired'.
I got yelled at once for reviving threads that were too old. It can prove confusing for people to read the old writings if ideas or facts have changed (such as old rulings or a discussion on the April 05 banned list). But there would have been no way to start a new thread about this.
I'm not trying to be rude or mean or anything, but it probably isn't best to revive threads that are this old. The information should be considered 'expired'.
Well, that initial incednt where you revived a thread was a miscomuncation on our part. We don't mind if you bump old threads, as long as there is a good reason for it. For example, you'll notice the mods might periodically bump an old rules question if the information is now out of date, or an old question might not have previously recieved an answer due to lack of info at that time. That makes sense, since most forums drum it into peoples heads to do a search before asking a question. Well, how can there question be answered correctly if our archived information is out of date? These are reasons why we allow it.
But yeah, you'll notice this member is currently banned on top of it being a dead topic. Like I said, there's no rule against it, and we've encouraged it with regard to rulings threads, but there should always be a good reason to do so.
But yeah, you'll notice this member is currently banned on top of it being a dead topic. Like I said, there's no rule against it, and we've encouraged it with regard to rulings threads, but there should always be a good reason to do so.
- Status