Not quite sure the correct way to resolve this situation.
from UDE's Player Management Forums
I was looking through the threads on these forums and came across a situation that I think I could resolve but am not sure if it would be the correct way to do so.
This is the thread: http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/community/forums/thread/1046320.aspx
Now one of the questions asked is:
It is simple enough to solve the problem if both players use Mystic Tomato's from different sets or have different rarities of the card, but what if they are both exactly the same?
I mean the opponent could use this to their advantage by deciding who's Mystic Tomato they set, depending on what situation arises.
For example:
If Nobleman of Crossout is used on the face down Mystic Tomato, the player could say it was not their card.
Or if the face down Mystic Tomato is destroyed in battle, depending on the situation the player could say it was or was not their card, in order to gain the most advantage from this.
Now I am sure that some players in this situation would not be happy at the opponent having the chance to cheat, even if the opponent was being honest about the choice they made and call a judge over.
I think that it would one of those situations where it would be up to the judge to determine who's card was set because it is not a situation where you can check card text, rulings or rewind the game to resolve the situation. I also dont see any way that you could legally know 100% who's card was set.
I would listen to what both players have to say and then check the field and both players hands to work out who could gain the most advantage from the situation.
I would then make a decision on what was said and how it was said by both players and the moves that could have been made from the situation and if the players actually saw and intended to make them.
Would this be the correct way to resolve the situation?
Thanks in advance.
http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/community/forums/thread/1058565.aspx
from UDE's Player Management Forums
I was looking through the threads on these forums and came across a situation that I think I could resolve but am not sure if it would be the correct way to do so.
This is the thread: http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/community/forums/thread/1046320.aspx
Now one of the questions asked is:
hey, so what happens (yugioh) if I give my opponent mystic tomato through exchange, and they draw theirs (after resleeving) and set a mystic tomato after they shuffled their hand?
would it matter, asside from just getting the card back, if it was the right one or not?
I answered:would it matter, asside from just getting the card back, if it was the right one or not?
It does matter which Mystic Tomato your opponent set.
If it was yours and you destroy it in battle, you could use the effect.
If it was your opponents and you destroy it in battle, they could use the effect.
But this brings up the question, how can you determine who's Mystic Tomato was set in the first place and is the player being honest about who's card they set?If it was yours and you destroy it in battle, you could use the effect.
If it was your opponents and you destroy it in battle, they could use the effect.
It is simple enough to solve the problem if both players use Mystic Tomato's from different sets or have different rarities of the card, but what if they are both exactly the same?
I mean the opponent could use this to their advantage by deciding who's Mystic Tomato they set, depending on what situation arises.
For example:
If Nobleman of Crossout is used on the face down Mystic Tomato, the player could say it was not their card.
Or if the face down Mystic Tomato is destroyed in battle, depending on the situation the player could say it was or was not their card, in order to gain the most advantage from this.
Now I am sure that some players in this situation would not be happy at the opponent having the chance to cheat, even if the opponent was being honest about the choice they made and call a judge over.
I think that it would one of those situations where it would be up to the judge to determine who's card was set because it is not a situation where you can check card text, rulings or rewind the game to resolve the situation. I also dont see any way that you could legally know 100% who's card was set.
I would listen to what both players have to say and then check the field and both players hands to work out who could gain the most advantage from the situation.
I would then make a decision on what was said and how it was said by both players and the moves that could have been made from the situation and if the players actually saw and intended to make them.
Would this be the correct way to resolve the situation?
Thanks in advance.
http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/community/forums/thread/1058565.aspx