Recent content by Koori

well our opinions still lets wait for more opinions

that is because divine wrath has a spell speed 3 being a counter trap. CED cannot be chained to cyber jars effect because its just a normal trap with a spell speed 2 heres comparisons: example 1 (chaining CED to swords) Chain 1: Swords of Revealing Light Chain 2: CED resolving: Chain 2: CED...

yes, just remember that pyro clock of destiny advances the turn count not the turn itself

yes, imperial order cannot negate the 2nd part of heavy mech support platform. its a condition that seems to come with all unionizing monsters, and not the effect of the actual card itself

hrm but since you changed its position through an effect, doesnt that still let you change its position by manual through flip summon? just like how stealth bird can go to face down def after flip summoning it from face down def to face up atk

heh i once pulled 3 rush recklesslies on an attacking mask of darkness to take 3000, my opponent was like puzzled and thought i was giving up till i flipped inferno tempest

either way makes sense: the common sense take on it and the "cards that force into attack position state it" take on it too but a ruling is a ruling, since we're judges, we interpret the "law" (ruling) not make em. besides it adds more fun to ditch an old combo and find new ones, not the same...

yes, that definitely works. So far i haven't heard of any errata on skull mark ladybug so since the card said 'sent to the graveyard' without specifying any restrictions, it works.

Im called a sage by alot of people...and that sage stone looks cooler than that dark sage

You are activating blowback dragon in your turn, therefore you are the turn player and you have priority. you are able to use one of your monsters effec/st once before it is subject to an effect such as destroying it by ring of destruction

well i guess for now we can call any life point damage done to a player "direct damage" since its directed to one player so basically the kinds of direct damage are: -overflow -direct attack -effect damage on the other hand, activation cost damage and maintenance cost damage are in a different...

heh yeah i have the same experience with those people, who resist the ruling cuz it ruins their "awesome" combos well, ever since i went for a small lv 1 judge title, those kinda arguements dimmed down a bit

oops typo, i meant direct damage *changing it soon* (probably was too in a hurrt to talk about "direct attacks" as one of the direct damage category) though im still not fully sure if overflow is considered direct damage

ok done...wow it made my opponent whine XD

A direct attack damage (thank ye mr. Raigekick for pointing this out) is damage done from a monster to a player's LP by any of the following means: -damage to the players LP through attacking (due to absence of defending monsters) -damage done by excess ATK in a "player monster's ATK &gt...