Recent content by Tkwiget

That's interesting. Although I'm not really sure if it's necessary since WoW resource sites like www.thottbot.com, www.wowwiki.com, and www.wowhead.com exist. All three of them are fairly popular and are known by the majority of the game's community. Still that's a cool feature. :P

Alright, since I'm not really that active anymore here on CoG since my departure from YGO, I figured some of my old YGO judge buddies that I discussed things with might play this game. I'm just curious as to how many people here play World of Warcraft on PC. I'm looking for more people to play...

Play against a real opponent and you might re-think that statement of the games not being great. They probably are some of the hardest games to get very good at in a short period of time. They test how well of a strategtist you can become.

=P I'm back. Charmander - Red/Blue Cyndaquil - GSC Mudkip -RSE I haven't played Diamond and Pearl. Just to let you guys know. There's a program for online pokemon gameplay. The software is called NetBattle. You probably could google a site called Smogon and download it off their site...

Yeah, I know what you mean about picking unpopular games to play. Your answer was also a little vague but then again I never asked for detailed answers. XD I'm the kind of person that likes games to involve a level of strategy on your part that makes it unique to everything else out there...

BF2142 has been giving me some issues with staying connected tot he servers. Still a fun game to play when you got a few hours to kill. I've recently been messing around with the old game Fallout Tactics. It's been proving to be quite a challenge with all the stuff you have to do in the game...

Awesome. I shall buy the game then cause it looks extremely promising. =)

Quake 4 gives me that man. The Elite Strogg soldiers flank you and cover for one another while others advance on your position. Now make that enemy force of soldiers about 14 and you have one heck of a challenge. Not the same as Tomb Raider but still is very similar in its own respect.

I've never played Half-Life games for PC. I played one for PS2 and it seemed to be an extremely long game. Not that it's a bad thing. Most shooter games lack a lengthy single player mode. Warcraft 3 is boring to me. I already have my RTS game and that's Supreme Commander. I hate GTA games...

Already played it. Wasn't very impressed. I think Supreme Commander is better anyway. I'm pretty sure Vista on my PC will drop kick me in the head if I try and mess with it. So I rather not risk it.

Note: This thread is to discuss/talk/chat/whatever about video games, PC games, game design, the gaming industry, etc. Alright, since this site usually has an interesting crowd of people on a daily basis. Since I quit Yu-Gi-Oh! because of personal reasons I figured this would be a great time...

I haven't really looked at the card in over a year or so. That's my main reason why I'm not familiar with the mechanics of the card.

Mmkay, that helps a great deal. I'll post up more questions when I get them. That judge's list post eliminated a lot of my confusion.

Ok, then how's this for an interesting question. If Forced Req. is a mandatory trigger effect, then how come it has a ruling that suggests other wise? Continuous effects are "active" while face up on the field. Mandatory Triggers have no such mechanics. Please explain to me how Forced...

Does Forced Req. have a mandatory trigger effect or a continuous effect? After I get my answer I might have additional questions.