Search results

I read this whole thread before posting. -_- Just because something is not explicitly stated does not mean it is not part of the card's effect. There are examples of this type of omission of common sense, but they escape me at the moment. When things are destroyed, their normal destination is...

Destroying either Vampire Lord or Sacred Phoenixes that are in the deck/hand via Chain Destruction makes perfect sense, since Chain Destruction says destroy. And they end up going to the Graveyard, where their effects trigger next Standby Phase. Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys/Vampire Lord will not...

Tremendous Fire, Oxygeddon, Mecha-Dog Marron? -John

Painful Choice: YES! That's it, you win. When in Rome = Roman-esque guard in background. Cringe in fear = look at the people on Painful Choice. Solomon was referring to King Solomon, and the remaining hints were to direct you to him, who put the baby's true mother in a situation with a truly...

Reasoning: No. Royal Decree: No. Delinquent Duo: No..... to clarify, this card was what the true mother was faced with.....that's a DEAD (emphasis, not a hint) giveaway. -John

She was doing it because, since she was the real mother, she'd rather the baby live than die, even if it wasn't with her. But that's too far into the plot. -John

The real mother offered to let the other mother-claimer keep the baby, showing her true maternal feelings, hence Solomon knew who the true mother was. -John

Yes, now, what card describes that situation? -John

Dark Balter the Terrible: No. Frontier Wiseman: No. The above hint caused this to happen upon a true mother. -John

Tainted Wisdom: No. Jeremy, you're on the right track, go down taht road more and re-examine the other clues. -John