I'd rather win now.

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Complex_Mind

Deck Mechanic
Deck Name : I'd rather win now.
Author : Dustin Murray
Count : 40

Monsters : 18

Tribute:

Cyber Dragon
Cyber Dragon
Mobius the Frost Monarch
Mobius the Frost Monarch

Non-Tribute:

Breaker the Magical Warrior
D.D. Assailant
D.D. Assailant
D.D. Assailant
D.D. Warrior Lady
Dekoichi the Battlechanted Locomotive
Dekoichi the Battlechanted Locomotive
Gear Golem the Moving Fortress
Magician of Faith
Mystic Swordsman LV2
Sangan
Spirit Reaper
Spirit Reaper
Spirit Reaper

Spells : 14

Brain Control
Book of Moon
Dark Hole
Heavy Storm
Mystical Space Typhoon
Nobleman of Crossout
Premature Burial
Scapegoat
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Snatch Steal
Swords of Revealing Light
Reinforcement of the Army

Traps : 8

Bottomless Trap Hole
Call of the Haunted
Dust Tornado
Dust Tornado
Sakuretsu Armor
Sakuretsu Armor
Sakuretsu Armor
Torrential Tribute

Explanation: I decided this Saturday, that I was sick of inconsistent and unstable decks all together. I was so accustomed to them, I thought I couldn't play unless something could go wrong. High maintenence decks are my style. But this one. I want to win now. So I decided to compose this beauty based on common sense.

Make suggestions but I warn you away from saying "This is a netdeck of this and blah blah blah." I know it isn't original, and I know this isn't the casual play deck section. I didn't post this deck for originality. Have fun.
 
Complex_Mind said:
Deck Name : I'd rather win now.
Author : Dustin Murray
Count : 40

Monsters : 18

Tribute:

Cyber Dragon
Cyber Dragon
Mobius the Frost Monarch
Mobius the Frost Monarch

Non-Tribute:

Breaker the Magical Warrior
D.D. Assailant
D.D. Assailant
D.D. Assailant
D.D. Warrior Lady
Dekoichi the Battlechanted Locomotive
Dekoichi the Battlechanted Locomotive
Exiled Force
Magician of Faith
Mystic Swordsman LV2
Sangan
Spirit Reaper
Spirit Reaper
Spirit Reaper

Spells : 14

Brain Control
Book of Moon
Dark Hole
Heavy Storm
Mystical Space Typhoon
Nobleman of Crossout
Premature Burial
Scapegoat
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Snatch Steal
Swords of Revealing Light
Reinforcement of the Army

Traps : 8
Bottomless Trap Hole
Call of the Haunted
Dust Tornado
Dust Tornado
Sakuretsu Armor
Sakuretsu Armor
Sakuretsu Armor
Torrential Tribute

Explanation: I decided this Saturday, that I was sick of inconsistent and unstable decks all together. I was so accustomed to them, I thought I couldn't play unless something could go wrong. High maintenence decks are my style. But this one. I want to win now. So I decided to compose this beauty based on common sense.

Make suggestions but I warn you away from saying "This is a netdeck of this and blah blah blah." I know it isn't original, and I know this isn't the casual play deck section. I didn't post this deck for originality. Have fun.
Click to expand...
If the deck is so perfect.. why bring it up?

Net deck or not.. Remember the section is for suggestions on what can make it better.. who will tell you how to make it better if it already is wining you games and you really dont want changes on it.

I could trow out over 5 suggestions that will make you think.. "Hey.. what is this guy talking about, nobody will ever run thouse cards. their stupid!"

the funny thing is, since I'm runing it, then I know the cards needed to make this deck feel the pain.

but I oviously dont need to tell you what is the anti meta for this or "Tech" since you know it just dont care for it :)
 
krazykidpsx said:
If the deck is so perfect.. why bring it up?

Net deck or not.. Remember the section is for suggestions on what can make it better.. who will tell you how to make it better if it already is wining you games and you really dont want changes on it.

I could trow out over 5 suggestions that will make you think.. "Hey.. what is this guy talking about, nobody will ever run thouse cards. their stupid!"

the funny thing is, since I'm runing it, then I know the cards needed to make this deck feel the pain.

but I oviously dont need to tell you what is the anti meta for this or "Tech" since you know it just dont care for it :)
Click to expand...

You obviously didn't read my two paragraphs. I did ask for suggestions. And I didn't say this deck was perfect, I am in constant alert of what to edit. And if something pops up in someone's head that I haven't thought of yet, more power to them. It's happened before.

And to the suggestions for the Cyber Jar in place of the Spirit Reaper, Giant Trunade in place of the Smashing Ground and Lightning Vortex in place of the Sakuretsu Armor.

Cyber Jar can help out your opponent too much, I love it when my opponent uses it (THANKS FOR the 4 CARDS TO MY HAND!). If I ran more monsters, I may consider it. And I run 3 Spirit Reaper because I refuse to run a Don Zaloog, Don Zaloog pops out for one turn, might hit your opponent (considering a lack of Widespread Ruin, Sakuretsu Armor, and so on) then next turn, he either gets destroyed by a monster, Smashing Ground, or whatever the case is. Spirit Reaper however, if you crack at your opponent with it, you get a card, then they do whatever, summon D.D. Assailant to smack into it, the damage is worth the card out of hand, then I'll switch it to defense. But the same thing can be said for Spirit Reaper. ;)

I run 3 Smashing Ground for monster removal, and considering that I do not run Newdoria's or Old Vindictive Magician's. Or something of that sort. I have to rely on these cards for monster removal : D.D. Warrior Lady, Exiled Force, Smashing Ground x3, Sakuretsu Armor x3. Spell/Trap Removal is Breaker the Magical Warrior, Mobius the Frost Monarch x2, Mystical Space Typhoon, Heavy Storm, Dust Tornado x2.

I'm against not destroying Spell/traps. Giant Trunade only prolongs the definite activation of the trap that was returned.

Smashing Grounds are in to replace Lightning Vortex, I can't afford to discard due to cost, and when I can, I don't want to. It makes it a 2-? and usually the number of face-up monsters on your opponents side of the field is 1. MAYBE 2. But consider this. If your opponent has card advantage (say 3 monsters out to your 0) chances are, you won't have the card to discard for Lightning Vortex because you've been trying to fend off those monsters without it. Wasting cards.

Thank you for your suggestions. :)
 
I reccommend a pair of 4-star monsters that can actually hold their own on the battle front. GeAF is powerful, and is a great Cyber-Dragon-Repellent. Berserk Gorilla is also pretty sturdy.

-pssvr
 
I don't think he really needs sturdy 4 stars, his monster line looks fine, but I just hope he remembers that 300 attack won't cover your lp much if they decide to quick swarm or pull a Bazoo on you, 3x reapers seem a bit much maybe consider a mjar if you fall behind.

But in conjunctin with what krazy was saying, you don't have to post with an air of superiority, its more annoying than anything else...and krazy, hindsight is 20/20 its easy to counter a deck if you know the contents, but at regs chances are you won't have that luxury
 
and krazy, hindsight is 20/20 its easy to counter a deck if you know the contents, but at regs chances are you won't have that luxury
Click to expand...

I think if your opponent is playing netdeck cc, you'll know what they're gonna play next... Just my opinion that if you want the element of surprise (and I'm not saying CM does) then you might want to try something other than netdeck...
 
If you did not want people to comment about it in that fashion, you did not need to post it. It clearly looks like a Netdeck. I thought the purpose of netdecking was to copy the winning Deck and use it. You do not need to change a Netdeck. Lastly, here is my suggestion. Do not use this Deck. If you do, you are contributing to everything that is wrong with Yu-Gi-Oh! right now.
 
Tiso said:
If you did not want people to comment about it in that fashion, you did not need to post it. It clearly looks like a Netdeck. I thought the purpose of netdecking was to copy the winning Deck and use it. You do not need to change a Netdeck. Lastly, here is my suggestion. Do not use this Deck. If you do, you are contributing to everything that is wrong with Yu-Gi-Oh! right now.
Click to expand...

Yet another person who did not read my whole posts. I asked for suggestions and comments. I did not ask for people not to comment on this deck. I asked for comments and I'd prefer it if you'd post comments on the deck and not comments I asked you NOT to post (i.e. THIS IS NETDECK) now obviously you didn't understand what I meant but if you're going to post like that, I'd ask you to post like that somewhere else, not on my deck. And I do agree I don't have enough monsters that stay on the field, and if they do, they eventually remove themselves and so on. I noticed this last night when I was dueling my brother and took out Exiled Force for a Gear Golem the Moving Fortress, it stops Cyber Dragon's and draws out Smashing Grounds. And so far it's working well.

And I did not post with an "air of superiority" I merely said this deck is good and not to tell me the obvious. And also, if you make suggestions, it's probably about a 97% chance I already considered them. So REALLY think about it. Thanks for the comments.
 
<6th edit: I decided not to say anything rather than risk getting accused of flaming. Nonetheless, the Council has been made aware of this thread>
 
What I can't understand is this: if you don't want to be told "this is netdecked" then why post it at all? Decks that are netdecked are tournament ready for the most part. Someone has proven that it works, and so others follow suit. Seriously, what comments can you honestly expect to get on a deck like this? Especially if there is a "97% chance you've already considered them."

It's likely the only suggestions you're gonna get are: A) stop netdecking or B) something that you wouldn't run because it's not popular in this meta.
 
Complex_Mind said:
Yet another person who did not read my whole posts. I asked for suggestions and comments. I did not ask for people not to comment on this deck. I asked for comments and I'd prefer it if you'd post comments on the deck and not comments I asked you NOT to post (i.e. THIS IS NETDECK) now obviously you didn't understand what I meant but if you're going to post like that, I'd ask you to post like that somewhere else, not on my deck. And I do agree I don't have enough monsters that stay on the field, and if they do, they eventually remove themselves and so on. I noticed this last night when I was dueling my brother and took out Exiled Force for a Gear Golem the Moving Fortress, it stops Cyber Dragon's and draws out Smashing Grounds. And so far it's working well.

And I did not post with an "air of superiority" I merely said this deck is good and not to tell me the obvious. And also, if you make suggestions, it's probably about a 97% chance I already considered them. So REALLY think about it. Thanks for the comments.
Click to expand...

Maybe you could post your thoughts before we go at it, its not like we have the time to just sit down and give deep and long thoughts into a deck that we haven't played. Thats why for some threads I am offering to play people on YVD so I can offer suggestions after a game after I see how they play it. Pssvr what do you consider cookie cutter, its one thing seeing the contents of the deck and another inferring pretty close to what the deck is running, but yeah I see your point, its close enough sometimes.
 
Locked pending review of certain comments.

However, I'll say this up front: If you don't want any given member of COGOnline to comment on your deck, don't post it. We'll have none of this kinda thing.

edit after review:

Complex_Mind: you are welcome to re-post your deck in a new thread, but this one will remain locked.

Everyone else: DON'T SPAM IT. If you don't have any suggestion(s) other than pointing out exactly what the poster doesn't want you to, there's plenty of other decks to comment on out here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top