So Im putting up comments on everyones suggestions- Overall Im going to be adding some
Mystic Tomato to my deck, for overall deck speed.- the only problem is my dark/ light ratio. trying to figure out what needs to go and what stays. Ive also been looking at the use of
Newdoria- the only problem I see is that Ive already have alot of cards in my deck used for the main purpose of monster destruction. Yes it IS a dark monster which is always a plus and 1200 atk. iasnt bad at all. Honestly out of all the ideas these two seem to hit home for what I was looking for. Ive already sided deck a
Bazoo the Soul-Eater, and
Return from the Different Dimension.
~thanks TKwiget
Goblin Elite Attak Force stays in my deck This is because of my deck synergy, GEAF goes very well with this deck- It destroys
Cyber Dragon which alot of people are running in todays format and with 1500 def. its going to have to take a nice card to destroy it, unlike
Goblin Attack Force which
Spirit Reaper could run over. That stays as for the rest. You suggested getting rid of
Spirit Reaper- but for what? The dark/ light ration needs to stay the same for my deck to work and 3
Spirit Reaper hurts an opponet and most dont expect 3 to be played. It messes up the deck synergy again. A thing to note with this format Deck Synergy is KEY. With many games you come to a point in which your top decking and while my deck is designed not to do that to me it still happens once in awhile. With excellent deck synergy when Im top decking 9 times out of 10 I get a card that I need. Making topdecking not such a scary and costly thing. If I had
Smashing Ground Id play it, enough said on that. As for
Bottomless Trap Hole I had 2 before but after a long and indepth analysis of my deck I found that I already had alot of monster removal cards and not enough M/ T removal so I have
Bottomless Trap Hole side decked and my deck has 2
Dust Tornado.
~Thank you for your help Velius
The Shallow Grave- thank god for the linking, lol I had no clue what it was till I read its stats. After reading them to me the idea of your opponet getting a card bothers me. Im not up to helping myself and giving them a card on the field.... can you say
D.D. Warrior Lady= kill
Spirit Reaper? Cuz we all know thats what they will get if it isnt RFG already.... too risky but if I have three
Spirit Reaper and well they dont get anything for it, they only get to sit there and cry as they try to find something to remove him from the field, since their attacks are not going through.... OH and removing cards from their hands. I just love setting 2
Spirit Reapers on an open field and watching my opponets face as they drop their last two CIH. Its a nice expression of I win you lose.. lol. heck I wouldnt care if
Spirit Reaper had 100 attack as long as the effect went off. Yeah That card gives too much of an advantage to my opponet and defeats the whole purpose of
Spirit Reaper. As for
Monster Reincarnation- I see alot of possiblilties for this card and not just for
Spirit Reaper. Im going to actually deck test it a bit to see how it works...... Its a good idea and honestly I had totaly forgotten about that card. You dont see much play of it honestly. Shoot I remember playing it when I first started out haha and then I stoped using it. Now I remember why I dont play it... its too costly giving up a card to play it. its a 2 for 1 which isnt good in this format. Im actually more willing to give up life points then cards,
Nobleman of Extermination is too costly as well. It cant be chained to anything and theres alot that can be chained to it as well. Most people dont set magic cards unless your like me and you set
Heavy Storm on the first turn for a nice 2 for 1. But other then that it isnt god against dark world decks which are going to be a deck seen more often now. Its just not worth removing a
Dust Tornado or something else for it. As for
Card Destruction..... yeah not happening, that card = I get my butt handed to me with the new dark world deck..... Lol Its actualy in my side deck. Its not a good main deck card but a good side card.
~ thanks sirch1964
The idea of removing 1
Cyber Dragon for
Airknight Parshath is something that Ive contemplated for awhile now. When I saw that idea, I kinda hand a major weak moment there and almost did it. I then emediatly called my boyfriend who has taught me the game thus far and has a deck similar to mine. He actualy took my deck and modified it some with the adition of a
Mystic Tomato and three
Smashing Grounds. His deck works well, in the beging of the format when I had suggested using
Airknight Parshath he deck tested it and came to the conclusion that I had been thinking and hoping was wrong. With there being so many
Bottomless Trap Holes, and Sakuratsu Armors Airknight is risky. I myself like the comfort of knowing that
Cyber Dragon is a SS and does need a tribute.. NEVER EVER TRIBUTE FOR CYBER!!! well only if your going to win the game by doing so. If I play Airknight Im going to lose a card from it and possibly lose Airknight himself. Unlike Mobious which gives me a 2-1 right away when he is played, thanks to that wonderful thing called priority. While gaining cards in this format is a plus Ill say one thing. If an opponet of mine play Airknight Id Sak. its little butt Immediatly. Its too risky of a card to play but I def. did think twice before sanity came into play. He is one of my more favorite cards its just he isnt good in this format.
~Thank you for you help Supreme Switch Blade
As for legalizing EEN, I dont think its alowed to be played in this weekends regionals... I was talking to one of the local Judges who Im said to say doesnt deserve that title at all. He doesnt know anything...... its really sad. heck I know more then him. But anyways.. okay after saying that about him Ive got no clue why I listened to him, lol, but maybe he is right.....
MAYBE
Thanks for everyones help!!!