Last Will errata

[John Danker]

Many of you may have seen the errata on Last Will...likely giving insight as to why they're allowing only 1 in this new list.
One problem though is that they haven't updated the FAQ to reflect what the errata seems to imply. At this point I wouldn't blame a judge for ruling it either way. You'd think if they're going to make an errata ona card they'd change the FAQ to reflect the errata....assuming the errata text is actually changing the way the card can be played as the new text infers.

I guess until the FAQ is updated I'll rule it as the FAQ currently states <shrug>

 

[John Danker]

I certainly wouldn't blame a judge for ruling it either way at this point...though personally, until the FAQ changes or until there is a post on the judge's list I'll be instructing my judges to rule it as the FAQ still states. Keep in mind, I'm not disputing that it very well have changed, I'm also not discounting that it hasn't....but the FAQ hasn't changed so I'm sticking to it for now.