List of Archfiends?
- Thread starter Ojimaru
- Start date
Fury said:
Both of Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning's effects are Ignition Effects, none are triggers. So you want to be able to attack twice with him, you are supposed to announce that that is the effect you are activating in your Main Phase 1. That way if your opponent activates Waboku/Threatening Roar, you can't change your mind and remove something from play. This was how the Judges back in the 04 or 05 Worlds was told how the card needed to be played but since he was summarily banned it's a non-point in most cases.
DaGuyWitBluGlasses
New Member
densetsu_x said:
I'm pretty certain the OCG ruling has been changed to match the TCG's ruling, (when we got all our rulings updates for consistency, the OCG changed rules as well on issues)
Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning
Effect Monster (Warrior / LIGHT / 8 Stars / ATK 3000 / DEF 2500)
This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing from play 1 LIGHT and 1 DARK monster in your Graveyard. Once during each of your turns, you can select and activate 1 of the following effects:
"¢ Remove from play 1 monster on the field. If you activate this effect, this card cannot attack during this turn.
"¢ If this card destroyed your opponent's monster as a result of battle, it can attack once again in a row.
From the text on the card, it would actually look like both effects are ignition effects. So we need to actually still correct our way of playing it (like with what happenned when Dark Necrofear finally got errata-ed).
Effect Monster (Warrior / LIGHT / 8 Stars / ATK 3000 / DEF 2500)
This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing from play 1 LIGHT and 1 DARK monster in your Graveyard. Once during each of your turns, you can select and activate 1 of the following effects:
"¢ Remove from play 1 monster on the field. If you activate this effect, this card cannot attack during this turn.
"¢ If this card destroyed your opponent's monster as a result of battle, it can attack once again in a row.
From the text on the card, it would actually look like both effects are ignition effects. So we need to actually still correct our way of playing it (like with what happenned when Dark Necrofear finally got errata-ed).
DaGuyWitBluGlasses
New Member
How would you write the text to match our ruling, without it being significantly more complex, or verbose?
(In a way that's similar to other cards?)
(In a way that's similar to other cards?)
Never mind... I was summarily informed that Japan did change that ruling. *sigh*