Swords of concealing light Vs Light of intervention

This would have to be one of the rulings I don't agree with.

Nowhere on the card text does it state monsters cannot be flipped face down. It only prevents monsters from being 'set' face down. Flipping a card face down is NOT setting the card.

P.S. I tried to edit my post above really quickly hoping nobody would notice, but I was too late...:-(
 
But the rulings also say that if a card effect would place the monsters in face-down defense (like the effect of "Morphing Jar #2") then they are placed face-up defense.

So with "Swords of Concealing Light", monsters would be switched to defense position, but remain face-up and their battle positions could not be changed. Think of it as if "what if the opponent only had tokens on the field?" (they go and stay in defense position since they can't be flipped face-down).
 
chaosruler said:
well, it says that they cannot be set, and if you consider BoM re-setting them, it makes since.

-chaosruler
Unfortunately, I don't. The text on "Book of Moon" says to 'flip' a face-up monster into face-down defense. It doesn't say take a face-up monster and 'set' it in face-down defense.

But I understand what you're saying...;):p
 
Digital Jedi said:
It really doesn't matter if a card was flipped face-down by an effect. That card is still considered Set.
From the 5.0 Rule Book:
"To Set a Monster Card, select it from your hand and place it face-down horizontally (Defense Position) on an open space in the Monster Card Zone."

also under the Glossary of terms:

"Placing a card face-down is called a "Set". For Monster Cards, placing it in face-down Defense Position is called a "Set"."

Neither of these define 'set' as 'flipping' the monster face-down.
 
skey23 said:
From the 5.0 Rule Book:
"To Set a Monster Card, select it from your hand and place it face-down horizontally (Defense Position) on an open space in the Monster Card Zone."

also under the Glossary of terms:

"Placing a card face-down is called a "Set". For Monster Cards, placing it in face-down Defense Position is called a "Set"."

Neither of these define 'set' as 'flipping' the monster face-down.
Ahhh, but your confusing the action "SET" with the orientation "SET." The act of setting is called a "set" but a face-down defence postion monster is considered "set." One is an action, the other is a state of being. And no where does it say that flipping a monster face-down isn't a set.
 
Back
Top