Does the effect of The End of Anubis negate the effect of Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV6? I mean the effect of summoning Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV8.
So you'd declare activation of a spell/trap and pay the cost before activating it? Bit dodgy since this would allow players to bluff so as to check if you've a negation ready, if you do they claim that they meant one of their other cards if they both have the same activation costs, afterall you don't know which card in their spell and trap zone they should've flipped.pssvr said:Incorrect. This is how it goes:
1 You declare that you are activating the card's effect. Activation condition's must be correct.
2 You pay any costs, including designating a target, if it is required.
3 The card is now activated, and will be placed on the chain block.
-pssvr
The first kind is activation costs. These are paid when you activate (play) a card. Activation costs cannot be negated by cards that negate the effect of a card.
[/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Activation" is when you declare an intent to use a card: flipping a Trap Card face up, announcing that you are using a monster's effect, flipping a face-down Spell Card, and playing a Spell Card from your hand are all examples of activation.[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
There are two key concepts in the Yu-Gi-Oh! TRADING CARD GAME concerning "costs":
1. Costs are paid before the activation of a card, not after.
Nitpicky, but yes, you are technically right there.is misleading. The card isnt activated when the Cost was paid. The "effect" is activated when you pay the cost.
The card Exiled Force has no activation. Monsters are summoned. Their effects activate.
Costs are not a part of activation? How can you seperate the two?pssvr said:But the point is: It seems to be the opinion of most people (and you) that costs are a part of activation. If that is true, then negating activation means negating costs, which it clearly does not. Therefore, costs must not be part of activation. So exiled will be negated by EoA. Point proven, and case closed. I refuse to argue any more about something I already know is true.
-pssvr
pssvr said: