this question popped up recently in some discussions I have been having:
Player1: has a set Dragged Down to the Grave. They have 1 Exchange spelll card and 1 ARmy God-Silver in their hand.
P1 activates Exchange, forcing the P2 to take Silver, and P1 takes (whatever)
P1 activates the set DDttG and chooses to discard Silverfrom their opponent's hand.
Because Silverwas discarded by a card effect it special summons itself to the field.
QQ: Will Silver consider itself discarded by an "opponent's" effect, considering that both monster and DDttG were controlled by different players when the discard occurred, and activate?
My own thoughts are no, it would not. Silver, or Gold, would determine who was the controller of the discard effect only after it had been special summoned back to the field on the owner's side. Since DDttG was also controlled by the same player, the effect would not activate.
But I need to know for certain.
Player1: has a set Dragged Down to the Grave. They have 1 Exchange spelll card and 1 ARmy God-Silver in their hand.
P1 activates Exchange, forcing the P2 to take Silver, and P1 takes (whatever)
P1 activates the set DDttG and chooses to discard Silverfrom their opponent's hand.
Because Silverwas discarded by a card effect it special summons itself to the field.
QQ: Will Silver consider itself discarded by an "opponent's" effect, considering that both monster and DDttG were controlled by different players when the discard occurred, and activate?
My own thoughts are no, it would not. Silver, or Gold, would determine who was the controller of the discard effect only after it had been special summoned back to the field on the owner's side. Since DDttG was also controlled by the same player, the effect would not activate.
But I need to know for certain.